TexShare
Courier Service Working Group Minutes
June 12, 1996
Clarion Hotel
Dallas, Texas
Members present: Gary Ives, Chair (UT Medical
Branch, Galveston); Amy Chang (Texas Tech University); Kathryn
Connell (UT Southwestern Medical Center); Mark Dolive (University
of North Texas); Scott Downing (East Texas State University);
Peter McGuinness (Texas A&M-Corpus Christi); Bonnie McNeely
(UT-Pan American); Karen Nichols (Lamar University); Tony
Rodarte (UT El Paso); Carolyn Thorne (Community College Liaison,
Dallas County Community College); Linda Bixler (Alliance for
Higher Education, Dallas); Jo Anne Hawkins (TexShare Project
Manager, UT Austin).
Absent: Eleanor Wilson (Sul Ross State
University).
The TexShare Courier Document Delivery Working Group gathered
in Dallas at the Clarion Hotel at 9:30 AM on Tuesday, June
11, 1996, for its second meeting. Linda Bixler of the Alliance
for Higher Education in Dallas joined the group as an advisor
on AHE's long-term experience with library courier services.
Jo Anne Hawkins commented on the future of TexShare management
and said that the group's report and recommendation would
need to be completed by July 29 so it could be presented
at this year's last meeting of the TexShare Advisory Board
on August 1. She reported briefly on the Texas Legislature's
House Committee on State, Federal and International Relations'
hearing May 8 in Austin at which presentations were made
about library resource sharing in Texas, including an excellent,
well-received presentation about TexShare by Dana Rooks.
Chair Gary Ives distributed the agenda for the two-day
meeting, a map of the state marked with universities' locations,
a summary of responses from TexShare library directors to
Gary's survey inquiring about their interest in a courier
service, and an OCLC statistical summary of TexShare libraries'
interlibrary loan activity.
Gary noted that the group would hear presentations from
three courier vendors during the day (Central Delivery Services,
Pony Express, and 3D Distribution Systems) with a break
for lunch, and that the meeting room was reserved until
9 PM if discussion was necessary after dinner. The group's
discussions would continue on Wednesday morning and would
end shortly after lunch.
Gary said that it will be difficult to predict the volume
of TexShare business for a courier vendor, and he thought
a flat rate contract might be the best option. Costs for
courier services include basically drivers' time and the
costs of maintaining routes, and one approach would be for
institutions to divide the costs based on a predicted level
of use.
Gary had included some basic information about our project
in his invitation to the courier vendors invited to the
meeting, all of whom provide regional courier service to
Texas libraries (Central Delivery Service, HARLIC; Pony
Express, UT El Paso and New Mexico libraries; 3D Distribution
Systems, AHE). He noted that because Amigos had established
a courier service with Federal Express for its member libraries
in April, we did not ask FedEx to do a presentation because
in effect the company would be competing against itself.
Representatives from Central Delivery Service of Houston,
Ricardo Antona, Regional Manager, and Steve Meave, CDS Air
Manager, arrived to make their presentation. CDS serves
as the courier for HARLIC, which includes the Houston area,
Galveston, Prairie View, and College Station.
The group responded to CDS' questions for information about
the nature of the materials being sent on interlibrary loan
and how these materials are sent. The group noted that timing
is the most critical issue and that ILL traffic has cyclical
highs and lows, with the busiest times of the year March-April
and October-November for general purpose campuses.
Mr. Antona said that CDS would use Federal Express to provide
courier service to TexShare libraries. It would provide
monthly reports by institution, track items sent, and provide
FedEx packaging and a powership workstation which would
require a dedicated phone line and a certain volume of business
per day per site. CDS could enter into an agreement with
each institution or with the consortium and could arrange
for daily or on-call pickup at each site. Packages would
be insured for $100 each with additional insurance available
for 50 cents per $100. CDS would file with FedEx for losses.
An exclusive agreement would not be required.
CDS would look at a minimum volume rate if we would enter
into a contract. TexShare would have to make a minumum commitment
as a consortium, rather than as individual libraries. Concluding
his presentation, Mr. Antona said he would provide additional
information and rates to us within the next week.
James Hoofnagle, President of 3D Package Express, and Shawn
Fagan, North Texas Sales Manager of 3D Distribution Systems,
Inc., arrived to make their presentation. 3D Distribution
Systems, the parent company, is 15 years old and carries
both heavy and small freight as a contract carrier. 3DDS
has served as AHE courier for seven years and employs 250
company and contract drivers around the state with hubs
in major cities for scheduled routes. 3DDS maintains both
staffed and pickup/drop sites, uses air and ground shuttles
between hubs, provides bank courier services around the
state, and travels to most cities daily, although getting
to Alpine would be a challenge. Specific day(s) per week
pickups could be scheduled for the few cities not on a hub.
Central billing to a consortium would be best and less
costly than billing by the piece or to individual institutions.
Concerning insurance and losses, Mr. Hoofnagle responded
that materials are not insured nor is loss reimbursed within
3DDS' regular service, but items can be individually insured
for a minimum of $7. Wrapping materials are not provided
by 3DDS but libraries could use anything USPS-approved.
Working Group members noted that the volume of materials
3DDS might anticipate would be comparable to its AHE experience,
and that a consistent time of daily pickup was critically
important to ILL operations. Mr. Hoofnagle said that he
would fax a preliminary proposal with cost estimates to
us by June 18 for our consideration and concluded his presentation
and he and Mr. Fagan left the meeting.
The group then considered a plan of work to accomplish
its task by the end of July, after agreeing that a courier
system of some sort appears to be a viable option for TexShare
libraries. The group will recommend to the TexShare Management
Group that we:
- Inform library directors of our progress on the project
- Write specifications for a courier service contract
- Send a request for proposals to potential couriers
- Receive and review proposals and bids from couriers
- Recommend a courier with which to contract for service
- Request TexShare seed money to subsidize the service;
libraries would pay a reduced rate based on the established
tier system of TexShare libraries
- Assist in implementation of and communication for a
courier service
- Monitor the courier service monthly and evaluate it
annually
- Consider naming the service TExpress
Points to consider in specifying a viable courier service
include:
- Service to all participating libraries
- Routine or on call pickup for all sites
- Throughput time standard 48-hour or 24-hour expedited
service from pickup to delivery
- Contact person
- Nonperformance clause
- Specific time of pickup
- Provision for extreme weather, accidents, unforeseen
circumstances
- Packaging and labels
- Provision for loss and damage
- Reporting mechanism
- Billing options: consortium or individual libraries
- Nonexclusivity option which allows libraries and/or
institutions to enter into other courier contracts
- Tracking option
- Approximately 240 days of service annually, with provision
for holidays
The Pony Express representative originally scheduled for
a presentation was unable to attend the meeting, so a substitute
for him was to meet with the group on Wednesday morning.
The group adjourned for the afternoon and agreed to reconvene
Wednesday at 8:30 AM.
Robert Hebert, District Sales Manager of Pony Express Courier
Corporation, met with the group on Wednesday morning. He
said that the company is a unit of Borg-Warner Security
Corporation and provides security and courier services for
banks, the Olympics, and other agencies. It is the nation's
largest courier and is accustomed to delivering time-sensitive
documents and materials. With branches in 25 locations throughout
Texas and hubs in Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas, it can
move materials in one to two days, including to Laredo,
Alpine, Edinburg. It uses primarily ground transportation
but has access to air if necessary.
Rates can be based on weight and distance or per delivery
location, with service 8-5, Monday-Friday. Materials are
insured for $100 as standard service. The company can cover
much of Texas quickly and can transport both loans and copies.
Billing can be done centrally, to a consortial agent, if
desired. Packaging is not provided, but Pony Express could
experiment with preprinted labels. Mr. Hebert suggested
we consider recyclable or fabric packaging which may save
on packing costs. A one-year contract with a possible extension
to a second year would be desirable, with a flat rate the
best price option for TexShare. The Pony Express system
includes the capability to track items; every package is
barcoded and waybills are provided. Pony Express does not
require exclusive agreements for service contracts. Scott
Moore of San Antonio would be the contact person for TexShare.
Tony Rodarte commented that Pony Express costs UT El Paso
$121 a month for daily courier service.
Mr. Hebert concluded his presentation and said that he
would fax a proposal to us within a week.
In reviewing the group's time line, Jo Anne said she would
try to get the minutes to the group by the end of the week,
and Gary said he would begin to draft the group's report
and recommendations for the Management Group. Jo Anne said
that she would have the couriers' proposals faxed to Working
Group members, and Bonnie said that she would fax a copy
of the TexShare tier arrangement to members as well.
Gary said that he would follow up with library directors
from whom he had received no response to his survey about
their interest in a courier service.
The group agreed that the first contract for a courier
service might not begin until late fall 1996 or January
1997, but that a year's contract was certainly desirable.
After receiving guidance and direction from the TexShare
Management Group and Advisory Board, the Working Group will
meet again in early fall to draft specifications for a courier
contract.
|