There was considerable discussion on the wording of section 8.0 "Costs". (At the 1/27/98 TexShare Advisory Board meeting, Joan Heath summarized changes to the Protocol being considered by the Working Group. A board member suggested that if the ILL Protocol were amended to allow TexShare members to charge, the ability should be limited to those who have historically done so, e.g. medical school libraries.) After much deliberation the Working Group reached a consensus to allow for charging of ILL with the following language in the Protocol:

Other Protocol revisions:

Sections 3.1 and 5.0 change some wording to "must".

Section 4.3.4. (add) "If libraries use TExpress to return non-ILL items, they must be clearly labeled to indicate where the item should be routed to at the receiving site, e.g. Circulation Department. " The Working Group also discussed the idea of placing a label or bookmark inside the book and agreed to contact Susie Thompson (TexShare Admin. Asst.) to pursue this idea.

Sections 4.3.2. and 4.3.3., change "will" to "must".

This completed the discussion of the Protocol revision. Joan Heath agreed to create a final copy of the revised Protocol and to present it to the Management Team for approval.

Rebecca discussed what data is needed with Dale Propp (Texas State Library). He suggested keeping track of total volume for both books and copies. Other suggestions: If possible, track the number of requests, filled copies, and filled loans. Also, include figures on total numbers by type of library (academic, full and selective; medical, full and selective).

After some discussion the group decided against including library to library statistics. The data is large and hard to use. Libraries can get this data from their individual OCLC reports.

It was agreed to request one report including all libraries having an OCLC symbol. We will ask OCLC to separate the report into four categories: state universities, private universities, community colleges, and medical school libraries. The report should include: Name of institution, code, loans, borrows, copies lent, copies received, total loaned, total borrowed, net taken from totals (Net = loans minus borrows). Include a summary page with totals only for the four categories. (referred to Texas Group report which Rebecca had).

There was a suggestion on the frequency of the report. It should include year-to-date and monthly statistics (two separate sections) for the four categories.

Once reports are received a load-leveling message will be posted on the Iistservs for the membership and included in appropriate Amigos publications. Members of the working group will rotate preparing the load-leveling message for the listservs. A copy of the monthly report will be provided to anyone who requests a copy.

Nancy and Rebecca agreed to draft a new statistical report and Ron would contact OCLC. Anticipated costs include $200 for programming plus a monthly fee.

It was also suggested that the Working Group post to the listserv suggested custom holding groups, e.g. TexShare 1, TexShare 2, TexShare 3... indicating what order to put schools within a custom holding group.

After some discussion Jeanette Mosley and Keiko agreed to draft a survey on Ariel to be sent to the TexShare membership. The goal of collecting this information is to provide TexShare management with a threshold on when it is cost effective to use Ariel.